BTS
Fans are now slamming Billboard for bringing up chart manipulation rather than asking BTS about their chart achievements. Some have also questioned whether Billboard would ask their other No.1 artists about chart manipulation.
i've never seen your other artists questioned about the impact within your own charts, yet if it's them talk about graphics manipulation? rlly? good photos, zero professionalism. for the next learn that the impact of bts is generated organically by the fan base.
— (moon)child
???? (@stayjinie) August 26, 2021
WHERE WAS THIS ENERGY WITH WESTERN ARTIST WHEN HE LITERALLY BEGGED HIS FANS TO USE VPN?? ITS IN CLEAR WORDS "CHART MANIPULATION" @billboard !??? pic.twitter.com/pID3JfWk8O
— alien ⁷ (@jeonmjtaee) August 26, 2021
This is not, however, the only problem ARMY has with the article. Another point of contention is the inclusion of quotes from fans of singers Olivia Rodrigo and Dua Lipa. These fans discredited the success of BTS’s song “Butter.”
On the July 24 chart, “Permission to Dance” debuted at No. 1 with 140,100 total sales, according to MRC Data, with “Butter” falling six spots to No. 7 and Rodrigo’s “good 4 u” holding at No. 2. But then, something highly unusual happened: The next week, “Butter” returned to No. 1 (leapfrogging Rodrigo and others) and switched places with “Permission,” which slipped to No. 7.
— Billboard
As Billboard stated, the singers’ fans, “claimed that it wasn’t a coincidence.”
@scrappyseal, noting the reversal, tweeted that BTS had ‘0 GP [general public] support. A real smash is sustained by the GP support.’ Another fan of both Rodrigo and Lipa’s, @lipaanostalgia, described BTS as having ‘fraudulent ways’ and its fans as ‘involved in chart manipulation’ and ‘mass buying.’
— Billboard
ARMYs are accusing Billboard of needlessly chronicling and inciting fan wars in an article that they had hoped would focus on BTS’s success.
no but seriously how are you billboard, a music magazine, and you have a whole interview with a band and don't ask a single question about their music…
— Liz⁷ (@baepsayed) August 26, 2021
using twitter fanwar as receipts while interviewing the biggest band in the world. is this what you call journalism @billboard at least put that degree to good use
— leigh⁷
(@mapofthesou7) August 26, 2021
wtf was that article????
they accused armys of chart manipluation, they wrote paragraphs about enl!stment, they even talked about replacing bts and included anti's fanwar…
please DON'T buy the magazine and do not show any support bc they talked bullsht about the boys.— hana⁷
(@jeonchuckle) August 26, 2021
In addition to chart manipulation and rival fandoms, the magazine mentioned another ever-controversial topic: military service. In particular, fans are taking issue with how BTS’s enlistment was mentioned in tangent with HYBE‘s profits, as well as the idea that “anything could replace BTS on the company’s balance sheet.”
[Military enlistment is] bad news for HYBE. BTS is the dominant engine behind the company’s income, bringing in about 85% of its 796.3 billion won ($680 million) in total 2020 revenue.
Though HYBE has begun diversifying its portfolio of talent — signing new K-pop acts and, starting next year, partnering with Universal Music Group (UMG) on a U.S.-based boy band talent show — it remains unclear whether anything could replace BTS on the company’s balance sheet.
— Billboard
(@staellarkv) 
